Comments on: Diggbar Modified due to “Valuable Feedback” From Publishers and the SEO Community http://www.aodmarketing.com/social-media/diggbar-modified-due-to-valuable-feedback-from-seo-community/#utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=diggbar-modified-due-to-valuable-feedback-from-seo-community Adapt or Die Marketing | It's the 21st Century, Will You Survive? Fri, 26 Mar 2010 00:19:54 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc hourly 1 By: Oggy http://www.aodmarketing.com/social-media/diggbar-modified-due-to-valuable-feedback-from-seo-community/comment-page-1/#comment-26 Oggy Fri, 17 Apr 2009 19:37:33 +0000 http://www.aodmarketing.com/?p=137#comment-26 @Will I think these changes will be put live soon. Digg's programmers are probably scratching their heads right now as it will not be an easy task. Once its rolled out, I will do an analysis of their job ;) @Will I think these changes will be put live soon. Digg’s programmers are probably scratching their heads right now as it will not be an easy task. Once its rolled out, I will do an analysis of their job ;)

]]> By: Will http://www.aodmarketing.com/social-media/diggbar-modified-due-to-valuable-feedback-from-seo-community/comment-page-1/#comment-25 Will Fri, 17 Apr 2009 01:42:51 +0000 http://www.aodmarketing.com/?p=137#comment-25 @oggy, i meant to write the "if" actually. You can put the "if" in the quotes for clarification. All of these so called changes to the diggbar are bullshit anyway. When I'm not logged in and click on stories, I still get the bar. @oggy, i meant to write the “if” actually. You can put the “if” in the quotes for clarification.

All of these so called changes to the diggbar are bullshit anyway. When I’m not logged in and click on stories, I still get the bar.

]]> By: T. http://www.aodmarketing.com/social-media/diggbar-modified-due-to-valuable-feedback-from-seo-community/comment-page-1/#comment-24 T. Thu, 16 Apr 2009 04:56:50 +0000 http://www.aodmarketing.com/?p=137#comment-24 As predicted: http://digg.com/tech_news/Censorship_Digg_and_the_diggbar As predicted: http://digg.com/tech_news/Censorship_Digg_and_the_diggbar

]]> By: Samuel Lavoie http://www.aodmarketing.com/social-media/diggbar-modified-due-to-valuable-feedback-from-seo-community/comment-page-1/#comment-22 Samuel Lavoie Thu, 16 Apr 2009 04:41:11 +0000 http://www.aodmarketing.com/?p=137#comment-22 Totally nail it about the digg iframe. Nice to see the follow up. Definitly this story involve a lot of people that all have kind of different goals into that. For me with that modified version it's seems that Digg "get it" making most of the people (the small and big guys) happy. Totally nail it about the digg iframe. Nice to see the follow up.
Definitly this story involve a lot of people that all have kind of different goals into that. For me with that modified version it’s seems that Digg “get it” making most of the people (the small and big guys) happy.

]]> By: Oggy http://www.aodmarketing.com/social-media/diggbar-modified-due-to-valuable-feedback-from-seo-community/comment-page-1/#comment-18 Oggy Thu, 16 Apr 2009 02:39:39 +0000 http://www.aodmarketing.com/?p=137#comment-18 @Will I wonder how much it pissed off Users vs. Publishers and SEOs. This may have been a way for Digg to inflate page views and they may get away with it. We will see how the Digg community reacts in the coming months. And by the way: “we believe that 301s transfer 100% of the linkjuice of a page over." is not my opinion, there's an "if" in front. I have put it in quotes now just in case ;) @Will

I wonder how much it pissed off Users vs. Publishers and SEOs. This may have been a way for Digg to inflate page views and they may get away with it. We will see how the Digg community reacts in the coming months.

And by the way:
“we believe that 301s transfer 100% of the linkjuice of a page over.”

is not my opinion, there’s an “if” in front. I have put it in quotes now just in case ;)

]]> By: Will http://www.aodmarketing.com/social-media/diggbar-modified-due-to-valuable-feedback-from-seo-community/comment-page-1/#comment-17 Will Thu, 16 Apr 2009 01:27:46 +0000 http://www.aodmarketing.com/?p=137#comment-17 "we believe that 301s transfer 100% of the linkjuice of a page over." Well, we can all agree that 301s aren't as good as direct links. This hopefully is just the beginning. They need to get rid of it. It was incredibly stupid to add. Artificially inflate their pageviews at the expense of pissing off many users so a mass exodus to Redditt eventually comes to pass. Dumb. It's a short term gain for a long term decrease in enthusiasm. “we believe that 301s transfer 100% of the linkjuice of a page over.”

Well, we can all agree that 301s aren’t as good as direct links. This hopefully is just the beginning. They need to get rid of it. It was incredibly stupid to add. Artificially inflate their pageviews at the expense of pissing off many users so a mass exodus to Redditt eventually comes to pass. Dumb. It’s a short term gain for a long term decrease in enthusiasm.

]]>